|
new physics
Link |
by
 
on 2006-05-22 15:18:54 |
|
the theory of everything has arrived~ [as what they claim it to be...] go to http://www.thefinaltheory.com/pages/2/index.htm    m y . L i F E . i . t r a d e . i n . f o r . y o u r . P A i N . |
|
Re: new physics
Link |
by
on 2006-05-22 15:44:21 |
|
http://homepage.mac.com/ruske/ruske/finaltheory.html http://la.indymedia.org/news/2005/08/134202.php The "new theory" presented in this book is nothing more than an overly-literal MODEL based upon the consequences of Einstein's equivalences. In short, you cannot do any experiment to show this MODEL disagrees with the "accepted" MODEL. In fact, the whole idea that a MODEL holds some secret truth about the universe is bogus! Nature behaves the way she will, regardless of the words we use to describe her. Wether we speak japanese or english, call it a "force" or an "expansion", or do our thinking in 2-D or 3D, its the same laws of nature we are talking about. I would never buy this book, after reading the first chapter online, and also the reviews. It makes me very sad that people are so easily confused by this play-science when there are real interesting things happening in REAL science! 
|
|
Re: new physics
|
|
This "new theory" book is based on what models that is used in the field of physics and it just points out what all the models in physics does not explain, such as, gravity. The book states that Newton did not explain what made gravity, but only explained the obserivation. Overall, i think the book is educational but it pointing fingers at what past physicsists did not figure out. |
|
Re: new physics
|
|
I agree with Gendou.... I wonder if the author despises physicists. Or perhaps he doesn't really have any in-depth knowledge of the subject. Although I acknowledge some of his points to be rather true but his arguments show that he only displayed trivial knowledge of the subjects.
Death, Rebirth and Create
|
|
Re: new physics
Link |
by
on 2006-06-12 10:49:40 |
|
it seems to me, this book is a result of two things: 1. a noble but ignorant wanna-be physicist 2. ignorant people who will believe anything they read Newton explained ALL HE NEEDED TO EXPLAIN to understand a phenomena! Other than understanding, what do we wish to gain from doing physics? Fame and recognition?! Aw, come on! That is selfish and i hates it. I can guarantee you one thing: no human will EVER explain WHY physical phenomena happen the way they do! The best any human can do is say "well, this is what it does, and here is how i figured it out." You will never hear a GOOD physicist say "here is how nature works, and this is WHY." Oh, and I know its just a title, but i fucking hate the popus ass title "The Theory of Everything". Suck my balls you pompus phoney!
|